hraness

saved

A sneak preview behind an embedded software factory. I suspect rapid application dev is back

by Geoffrey Huntleyghuntley.compublished

gist

Geoffrey Huntley is building Latent Patterns as a product that is also its own IDE: designer mode edits copy or behavior, then Cursor Cloud Agents ship with a risk gate for schema migrations. He treats code-editing agents as commodities, watches inference from his phone, and says the industry is circling back to 2000-era Access, Delphi, and Visual Basic hyper-personalised RAD rather than SaaS plus Zapier. He prompted first-party analytics, CRM, support, and scheduling into LP, and wants to replace CI/CD with safe live-edits of program logic as inference gets instant.

ideas

  • The product is the IDE. Designer mode edits Latent Patterns from inside itself; Launch Agent ships via Cursor Cloud Agents instead of a local editor.
  • Code-editing agents are commodities. Huntley does not run his own; he watches inference on his phone, on the loop rather than in it, and only halts on high-risk changes such as schema migrations.
  • RAD is back. Hyper-personalised business software used to be Access, Delphi, and Visual Basic; stitching SaaS with Zapier was the detour.
  • First-party widgets, prompted in. Analytics, CRM, support, newsletters, and scheduling were built by asking a coding agent for PostHog, Pipedrive, Zendesk, and Calendly rather than integrating those products.
  • Kill wait-for-CI. Even 60-second deploys are too slow; the destination is safely live-editing program memory and control flow as inference becomes instant.

quotes

within latent patterns, the product (latent patterns) is now the IDE.

Geoffrey Huntley, stating that the product has become the IDE.

I'm supervising it. I'm on the loop, not in the loop.

Geoffrey Huntley, describing how he watches Cloud Agent runs.

No, they had rapid application development, and these businesses had hyper-personalised software.

Geoffrey Huntley, locating today's SaaS-plus-Zapier stack as a detour from RAD.

How can we kill CI/CD as it is today and instead safely live-edit the program's logic?

Geoffrey Huntley, naming live-edit of control flow as the next step.